Aug 14, 2022
6:54:53am
6:54:53am
IMO Duncan was more valuable to a franchise
But not because he was a better player (shaq and Kobe were better players )
The difference is Duncan was a great teammate and was willing to take significant pay cuts to keep his teams together. That made it so that the Spurs could be great for a long time.
The difference is Duncan was a great teammate and was willing to take significant pay cuts to keep his teams together. That made it so that the Spurs could be great for a long time.
- Previous username
- thebruce
- Bio page
- JoeExotic
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Last login
- Apr 28, 2024
- Total posts
- 45,730 (2,777 FO)
