when it ran to :00, yes. then they got :01 back and would have had to rush the FG, but KS wanted to make sure they

Report problem with this ad

Nov 26, 2022
10:52:25pm

shimmy post à la mode scholar

didn't need to rush.

Report problem with this ad

shimmy

Previous username: AFCoug83
Bio page: shimmy
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Last login: May 4, 2024
Total posts: 117,290 (37,032 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

For those who didn't keep up with how that all went down:

RootieBoy Truly Addicted User

11/26/22 10:46pm

should not have called the timeout to aid them in any way with that. but still

kosmokramer

11/26/22 10:47pm

Agreed

RootieBoy

11/26/22 10:47pm

RE: For those who didn't keep up with how that all went down:

imdocrob

11/26/22 10:47pm

…

goodcleanfun

11/26/22 10:47pm

A lot more waiting happened before byu called timeout

BYU '80

11/26/22 10:47pm

Are we not allowed a chance to sub?

Huge Manatee

11/26/22 10:47pm

<< Deleted >>

cvd6262

11/26/22 10:49pm

Clock was at zero when he went down though.

777

11/26/22 10:48pm

not even close. it was at :02

shimmy

11/26/22 10:48pm

So Stanford got screwed.

777

11/26/22 10:49pm

when it ran to :00, yes. then they got :01 back and would have had to rush the FG, but KS wanted to make sure they

shimmy

11/26/22 10:52pm

It was likely closer to 2 seconds left. 1 for sure.

RootieBoy

11/26/22 10:48pm

Exactly. And by calling a timeout, it guaranteed Stanford would get to at least

Pierre Delecto

11/26/22 10:49pm

That is not true. Because the officials had to put more time on the clock, the clock does not start until the snap.

slatecoug

11/27/22 1:00am

Clock starts AFTER the snap. That 1 second lasts as long as the stanford

boctabulous

11/27/22 8:19am

Here's what really happened

slatecoug

11/27/22 12:57am

Excellent summary. I would only add -

Cswilliam01

11/27/22 6:33am

Yep.The officials are supposed to wait until the chains get there, but usually only wait until the down marker is there.

Posting on CougarBoard