Yes he was. Our D was based on the Steelers 3-4, and he was 100% an X and Os

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 29, 2022
3:59:42pm

Turnpike Lane Intervention Needed

Yes he was. Our D was based on the Steelers 3-4, and he was 100% an X and Os

Sometimes we simply didn't have the depth of personnel. And that was it. But we didn;t get outcoached or outschemed on the D side of the ball.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Nov 29, 2022 at 3:59:42pm

Message modified by Turnpike Lane on Nov 29, 2022 at 3:59:54pm

Report problem with this ad

Turnpike Lane

Previous username: lawboy
Bio page: Turnpike Lane
Joined: Dec 14, 2004
Last login: Oct 15, 2023
Total posts: 124,282 (29,256 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Was Bronco really an X's and O's guy? Roger Reid was an X's and O's guy... boring but X's and O's all the way.

(Private) Yormark is my Homeboy

11/29/22 3:57pm

Yes he was. Our D was based on the Steelers 3-4, and he was 100% an X and Os

11/29/22 3:59pm

Ok. Other than AF and GT please give me examples of where Bronco won the X and O's game.

(Private)

11/29/22 4:05pm

You made the assertion. You prove it.

11/29/22 4:25pm

The defenses he coached when he was just DC

Garn

11/29/22 3:59pm

I'll agree 100% that his defenses were fun to watch. As a fan of BYU growing up it was weird to be excited to watch

(Private)

11/29/22 4:17pm

I suppose it all depends what your definition of X's and O's is. Bronco was relentless in seeking to understand the

Mobettah

11/29/22 4:53pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad