And cited the first source. A source you approve, I might add.

Then I asked myself a question about the issue. A very reasonable question, one the first failed to address. A question apparently either unasked or conveniently ignored by the authors (and yourself) in the first source.

So I found another source which asked and answered the same question and clarifies the whole deep ocean heating issue as a non-starter.

You have ignored it. But when you have time your immediate response will be: "is not a peer reviewed source" to discredit it.

But the logic is so simple it really doesn't require review.

How did you get that my post was similar to Freddie Cougar's I'll never see.