What you just employed was a logical fallacy to shift the debate into an ad hominem attack. Read again what I said. It has nothing to do with my expertise. Nothing whatsoever. So you are completely in left field on that. Have no idea where you pull that from. I mean...what?

Let me speak in clear language for you so you understand. What he used was factually accurate. Recruiting services (Not me, recruiting services) may not be foolproof, but they are the industry standard for evaluating recruiting classes. By the industry standard, UCONN doesn't recruit as well as UVA. It's not even debateable.

I then commented that your parallel made no sense because it's not remotely factually accurate.

Fact: Recruiting services are the accepted industry standard for evaluation college football recruiting classes.
Myth: What you said about missionaries going off for two years to lift weights.

Ergo, what you suggested as a parallel is just fiction. It's like comparing apples and Abrams tanks.