... a couple of days ago.

http://cincinnati.247sports.com/Reply/Bearcatmac-Reply-45459800

"Here it is folks! All the @Big12Conference data on expansion candidates leaked.http://goo.gl/ppGJIF (They paid, I did it all for free"

Ok I tried to post each of his spreadsheet links. This guy is an eye doctor. Business must be really bad. How much time did he put into this?

Ha!  Tempted to reply to defend my occupational success, but who cares.  

Another of their responses:

Thanks Mac. Lol I gotta say the Byuers are putting on a full court press. They inundate any B12 expansion post - twitter, blogs, you name it - with a ton of word vomit on how superior they are to anyone else. They also conveniently omit any facts that don't help the narrative. 
Hm. Wonder where they learned this technique?

And here's one of their apparent insiders (MSMoose) post:

MSMoosesaid... (original post)

Hearing 14 is still better than 12. Also, still hearing candidate pairs are important, outside of Memphis, since Memphis would be considered a bridge.

Still hearing lack of desire for expansion with candidate on an island.

Texas is being very open and willing to investigate network, going as far as paying IMG College to develop analysis for B12. B12 Network will not happen without IMG playing major role, and B12 members are all for that.

B12 phone call today.

Cincinnati still entrenched at #11.

And the reply by the guy who posted the link to my stuff

Thanks Moose. If so my guess is BYU, CSU, UC and Memphis/UConn.

And it looks like Cinci is already starting to whine about the travel burden of being in the Big12 ...

http://www.wcpo.com/news/insider/uc-not-only-wants-to-get-into-the-the-big-12-it-needs-to-get-in