Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Apr 5, 2020
8:14:10pm

CallingDingo Starter

Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good

Report problem with this ad

CallingDingo

Bio page: CallingDingo
Joined: Oct 8, 2014
Last login: Mar 22, 2024
Total posts: 1,629 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

This could be a game changer. Serologic survey data is on the way!

Run-DMT

4/5/20 7:50pm

Serologic data without a confirmatory test is not going to end this

doctorcoug

4/5/20 7:54pm

Have you read the article?

Run-DMT

4/5/20 7:55pm

Sure did, but it didn't teach me anything I didn't already know. This virus is

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:02pm

Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good

CallingDingo

4/5/20 8:14pm

If disease prevalence is 5 percent, a + test is 50% to be a false positive. That

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:18pm

How about using IgG antibodies to Hep B to confirm immunity? Do you buy that?

Run-DMT

4/5/20 8:19pm

Sure do. The test parameters are significantly better. This is a really importan

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:31pm

How do you know it’s that bad?

CallingDingo

4/5/20 8:25pm

I read the packet insert, where sensitivity and specificity is published

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:30pm

It doesn’t have to be perfect. It gives a general sense of the immunity in the

Run-DMT

4/5/20 8:44pm

I absolutely agree with the value of a pop survey. But, with 50 percent false

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:56pm

One of my favorite things on CB. Posters who know know more than MDs from

Blueto

4/5/20 8:03pm

Well, I shouldn't be such a downer. Serologic testing is a cool advance, but

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:10pm

Aren’t you the guy who wanted us to wake you up only after we have a gold standard

JohnnyComeLately

4/5/20 8:32pm

Absolutely should be waiting to mass prescribe drugs outside a clinical trial

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:42pm

Yep time we absolutely have right now.

JohnnyComeLately

4/5/20 8:51pm

MDs rarely do research. Why should we accept what they say at face value?

ldssdl

4/5/20 8:31pm

That’s an interesting statement

Toubibe

4/5/20 10:06pm

My previous post was in reference to published research. I’ve seen MDs get stuff

ldssdl

4/5/20 11:17pm

Good response

Toubibe

4/5/20 11:23pm

This is not a diagnostic test per se. it’s to provide evidence of prior exposure

Run-DMT

4/5/20 7:57pm

With good chance of some bad data. Telling a negative patient that they are

doctorcoug

4/5/20 8:04pm

Can I just say that I hate clicking on these articles

PJMort

4/5/20 7:55pm

Fast

Boanerges

4/5/20 7:58pm

If they can scale this quickly it’s a big deal

AZ Coug

4/5/20 8:11pm

I've been saying this for a few weeks. This is a much better indicator than testing to determine

unctoothman

4/5/20 8:33pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad