Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up
Apr 8, 2020
8:16:04am
JmThms Truly Addicted User
Nothing changes in my remarks.
"It's likely that the marginal harm to the economy of a full shutdown (given that you're already mostly shutdown) is less than the marginal gain in fighting the disease."

That is what I push back on. I dont think I agree with this. "Marginal" to me implies "as we go forward". Each new day. As I wrote, the marginal cost/benefit going forward should increasingly shift from attention on epi curve to eco curve. This natural and expected. Any failure by government in this regard is on them.

The primary reason for implementing mitigation measures to flatten the epi curve was to prevent a substantial over-taxing of hospital resources, especially ICU resources. As it continues to show that this has and is generally working, then attention should naturally shift to mitigating economic harm caused by the mitigation measures. As long as our re-employment of the economy doesn't threaten that threshold peak of the epidemiological curve, we should smartly do so.
JmThms
Bio page
JmThms
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Last login
Dec 19, 2020
Total posts
13,784 (11 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.