why would we do that? we want a better game than the P12 most likely would provide.

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 24, 2020
12:43:41pm

HarlemCoug Truly Addicted User

why would we do that? we want a better game than the P12 most likely would provide.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Nov 24, 2020 at 12:43:41pm

Message modified by HarlemCoug on Nov 24, 2020 at 12:44:29pm

Report problem with this ad

HarlemCoug

Previous username: Big12
Bio page: HarlemCoug
Joined: Sep 8, 2014
Last login: May 10, 2024
Total posts: 32,362 (4,048 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I think Tom should put the following invitation out there publicly.

SlantRoute

11/24/20 12:31pm

That's not a bad way to put it in that case.

byukarl

11/24/20 12:34pm

Yep, still requires them to change their policy but they have precedent for that

SlantRoute

11/24/20 1:15pm

Amen.

DraperCoug22

11/24/20 12:38pm

Agree spotlight should be on the ridiculous PAC 12 rules, not BYU.

Mr. Scoobs

11/24/20 12:38pm

As great as this sounds, we all know this will not happen. BYU does not like to

_Dakoko

11/24/20 12:39pm

Actions will speak louder than words. No more statements, get a game instead.

Bandit

11/24/20 12:42pm

why would we do that? we want a better game than the P12 most likely would provide.

HarlemCoug

11/24/20 12:43pm

Because the damage has been done and BYU needs to fix it. This does both

SlantRoute

11/24/20 12:46pm

What the Twitterverse thinks doesn't matter hardly at all. What the CFP Committee thinks matters a lot.

Greg Kite's 'stache

11/24/20 12:57pm

Good. We want the committee to have proof that BYU will play anyone, any place

SlantRoute

11/24/20 1:04pm

They have that regardless of what the is out there on the internet. They have actual data sources, ADs, Presidents, etc

Greg Kite's 'stache

11/24/20 1:08pm

You give the committee too much credit. It's the same group that built the BCS

SlantRoute

11/24/20 1:11pm

You paint too much of a conspiratorial picture. If the difference between BYU-IN and BYU-OUT is the WA story...

Greg Kite's 'stache

11/24/20 1:20pm

It's not based in conspiracy at all, and here's why....

SlantRoute

11/24/20 2:06pm

B/C the final decision of who's in and who's out it really important and they'll get some real data

Greg Kite's 'stache

11/24/20 2:31pm

Haha, they will not pick up a phone and call Tom or UW's AD. Really?

SlantRoute

11/24/20 2:35pm

As i was saying. It definitive influenced the committee.

SlantRoute

11/24/20 7:52pm

I really don't think it had anything to do with it

Greg Kite's 'stache

11/24/20 8:00pm

I still think you're wrong.

SlantRoute

11/25/20 9:48am

“We publicly declare...” what is this, a proclamation from the Q12?

Iman23

11/24/20 12:49pm

Ya get rid of that verbiage

kotacoug

11/24/20 1:01pm

Hence, my clause in the OP that says a PR firm would clean it up.

SlantRoute

11/24/20 1:06pm

Maybe we should "solemnly declare" . . . 🙂

Tricky

11/24/20 1:52pm

"Let it be recorded on the fleshy tablets of my heart that BYU...". Better?

SlantRoute

11/24/20 1:59pm

"We state in the most ardent and solemn terms possible."

HenderCoug

11/24/20 2:20pm

I close mine epistle in the name of the Lord’s University even BYU. Public adieu

11/24/20 8:02pm

Honestly, it’s hardly an issue in the national radar except with haters. I

DwigtA2RM

11/24/20 1:17pm

<< Deleted >>

Abe Froman

11/24/20 1:26pm

I think we need a lot more from TH, local and national. Twitter isn't

delete_king

11/24/20 2:51pm

I do like that second approach a lot — for the reasons you state. Plus,

SinkingQuffa

11/24/20 4:12pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad