coaching abilities, intelligence or ability to fix a broken part of a program. I’ve seen and heard all three of those about Kalani here, and on other social media sites.

Bronco’s teams do bad - it’s because he’s more into building young men, firesides and family time.

Kalani does bad - it’s because he put his friendship above the good of the program, is a nice guy but a bad coach, and dozens of people on this board continue to insist that they don’t believe he’s capable of fixing this current problem.

I’m not saying this is a majority opinion or anything, but I am taking this from comments I’ve seen repeatedly. And they’re sometimes even right next to comments saying “bring Bronco back as DC” or I saw multiple people suggest as a consultant. That means they think Bronco can fix it and Kalani can’t.