Dec 9, 2022
4:56:55pm
4:56:55pm
The difference seems petty and benign.
From the article.
"What CVS agreed to was to fundraise from customers for three years—2021, 2022, and 2023—then give all that cash to the ADA. It would be CVS’s responsibility, however, to cover any gap between customers’ donations and that $10 million."
Now, if CVS collected MORE than 10 million and pocketed the difference, then we'd have something to conplain about. But that doesn't seem to be the issue here.
As someone who has regularly participated in the light the world giving machines, I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I'm also saying the CVS deal isn't bad either. I guess I just dont appreciate the difference as being that big of a deal.
"What CVS agreed to was to fundraise from customers for three years—2021, 2022, and 2023—then give all that cash to the ADA. It would be CVS’s responsibility, however, to cover any gap between customers’ donations and that $10 million."
Now, if CVS collected MORE than 10 million and pocketed the difference, then we'd have something to conplain about. But that doesn't seem to be the issue here.
As someone who has regularly participated in the light the world giving machines, I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I'm also saying the CVS deal isn't bad either. I guess I just dont appreciate the difference as being that big of a deal.
- Bio page
- botticus
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2013
- Last login
- May 2, 2024
- Total posts
- 425 (10 FO)
Messages
Time
12/8/22 6:54pm
12/8/22 6:57pm
I never donate at store card readers because it's companies double dipping. They get a charitable contribution
12/8/22 6:57pm
12/8/22 10:18pm
12/8/22 7:28pm
12/8/22 7:38pm
12/9/22 4:31pm
12/9/22 4:37pm
12/9/22 4:56pm
12/9/22 5:07pm