than 8 to give the providers enough content. Those same providers were fine with 10. 10 was not an issue and gave them enough.


This sudden change to look at two schools; they've already been eval'd and both recently rejected by the B12. They've already been eval'd and long rejected by the P10. Those eval's included talks with the TV providers. Those two schools do not move the needle. Even BSU had to demand freedom from having to share money with SDSU. If SDSU can't raise BSU's value, what does that say?



The only thing that makes sense for the PAC to, completely out of the blue, suddenly be in serious talks about adding SDSU and SMU is that they have fallen, or have a strong reason to believe they will fall below that 10 number.