RE: Interesting Patriot fumble numbers (warning: long, lotsa numbers,

Report problem with this ad

Jan 25, 2015
10:36:27am

Fatalplacebo

Report problem with this ad

Fatalplacebo

Bio page: Fatalplacebo
Joined: Jun 12, 2011
Last login: May 31, 2024
Total posts: 26,166 (13,842 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Interesting Patriot fumble numbers (warning: long, lotsa numbers, deflate-gate)

cscougar

1/25/15 9:32am

RE: Interesting Patriot fumble numbers (warning: long, lotsa numbers,

DapperDan

1/25/15 10:02am

RE: Interesting Patriot fumble numbers (warning: long, lotsa numbers,

Fatalplacebo

1/25/15 10:36am

I apologize for trying to present actual facts. And thanks for your insights....

cscougar

1/25/15 10:47am

Some people want competitive advantage to remain a mystery

Busiturtle

1/25/15 11:13am

I don't know why you're so bent out of shape over this

Fatalplacebo

1/25/15 11:43am

I couldn't care less about NE v IND

cscougar

1/25/15 12:06pm

Haha, "facts". You're this guy

DapperDan

1/25/15 11:47am

That was a well-thought-out post.

royal_blue

1/25/15 11:40am

I hate N.E. so bad I'll be rooting for the Seahawks to win the SB, and I would

Shimmy

1/25/15 12:03pm

So we agree

cscougar

1/25/15 12:08pm

Agreed. Perfectly placed helmet hits, punching the ball at the right time, etc.

Fatalplacebo

1/25/15 12:11pm

Hi friend! Your stats are garbage.

Nathanael Greene

1/25/15 12:12pm

He picked the 2007 date bec that's when the Pats started "prepping" their own

vacougfan

1/25/15 12:16pm

I picked the 2007 date to look at....and sure enough, there was a big change.

cscougar

1/25/15 12:20pm

RE: I picked the 2007 date to look at....and sure enough, there was a big

Nathanael Greene

1/25/15 12:33pm

I suppose I should further clarify.....

cscougar

1/25/15 12:38pm

You might be right. Can you explain further? Boardmail if desired.

cscougar

1/25/15 12:16pm

Hi friend! Your comment is garbage.

royal_blue

1/26/15 8:53pm

You're right, my suggestion should be more clear.

Nathanael Greene

1/27/15 9:48am

You're right. That doesn't preclude using the scientific method, right?

cscougar

1/27/15 10:03am

Okay, but at least his speculation was remotely plausible.

royal_blue

1/27/15 11:40am

RE: Okay, but at least his speculation was remotely plausible.

Nathanael Greene

1/28/15 7:13pm

This post is sad.

messi

1/25/15 2:00pm

Your response was actually more predictable than the Patriots ball security

cscougar

1/26/15 9:43pm

I'm having a hard time contemplating the fact that somebody spent this much time

TheDeek

1/27/15 7:46am

I'll explain the time for you

cscougar

1/27/15 8:01am

define "cheating", everything I'm seeing now is stating that the Patriots have

TheDeek

1/27/15 8:08am

For me, personally, I wouldn't exploit a loophole. However, I agree.

cscougar

1/27/15 8:18am

I exploit loop-holes all the time. They save me money on my taxes...

TheDeek

1/27/15 8:20am

Who's your favorite NFL team?

Non-donor troll

1/27/15 8:32am

Let me see if I can deduce the answer. (TIC)

cscougar

1/27/15 8:45am

using the same logic that lead to your conclusions about fumbles, I'd say

TheDeek

1/27/15 8:48am

I didn't conclude anything.....so are you saying I'm not a fan of any team?

cscougar

1/27/15 8:49am

sounds more and more like it, yeah... you're taking all the fun out of football

TheDeek

1/27/15 9:14am

Is there a reason you're being intentionally coy? This issue seems to really

Non-donor troll

1/27/15 9:19am

Sorry, I thought it was obvious: Seahawks

cscougar

1/27/15 9:30am

You might win more people to your conclusions if you weren't so condescending.

Fatalplacebo

1/27/15 10:20am

Point taken

cscougar

1/27/15 10:25am

But you aren't taking the points.. you are ignoring them

CarolinaCoug

1/27/15 2:30pm

And the last point that you should look at is that once teams had control of

LaserCoug

1/27/15 2:34pm

Regarding this whole thread . . . wow.

Posting on CougarBoard