Jun 18, 2018
1:57:41pm
1:57:41pm
How or other publications more "verified"?
Because they list an author, I guess?
If you insist on only peer-reviewed articles, the peer-review of Wikipedia is probably less predictable than a respected Journal.
That's all I can think of for a source being more "verified" than Wikipedia, though. Known authorship and clearer peer-review standards. That's enough to say "no Wikipedia," I suppose, but I do wonder if you are requiring sources that are generally more accurate than Wikipedia.
If you insist on only peer-reviewed articles, the peer-review of Wikipedia is probably less predictable than a respected Journal.
That's all I can think of for a source being more "verified" than Wikipedia, though. Known authorship and clearer peer-review standards. That's enough to say "no Wikipedia," I suppose, but I do wonder if you are requiring sources that are generally more accurate than Wikipedia.
- New username
- Madam Pattirini
- Bio page
- CosmoK
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Last login
- Jul 28, 2021
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
