Aug 16, 2018
7:39:42am
7:39:42am
Objectively, Beau was not the #1 last year. He was not the starter. We can argue
the stats, but that's not objective. Objectively, Tanner was the #1 last year.
I get what you're saying--Beau is, I think, a good QB. But I also think it's not hard to see what happened. Coaches thought Tanner was better, and with a freshman that they thought was as good as Beau, they'd rather go with the freshman as #2 pushing #1. That makes total sense. Most of CB would agree ... get the freshman ready to go. It's bad luck for Beau, but that's the way it goes.
I get what you're saying--Beau is, I think, a good QB. But I also think it's not hard to see what happened. Coaches thought Tanner was better, and with a freshman that they thought was as good as Beau, they'd rather go with the freshman as #2 pushing #1. That makes total sense. Most of CB would agree ... get the freshman ready to go. It's bad luck for Beau, but that's the way it goes.
- Bio page
- runnincoug
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Last login
- May 3, 2024
- Total posts
- 33,419 (2,541 FO)
