relied on supposed Arizona evaluators to support your position that Romney has more potential. I pointed out that even id some Arizona evaluator believed that, there is a mountain of evidence to the contrary. So yes, if you're talking about "hype" and "potential" regarding a couple of guys who played sparingly as freshmen then yes, the offers those players had (combined with every recruiting service) is the ultimate litmus test for who should be viewed as having the most potential. Now, that obviously doesn't mean that the player who was viewed as having greater potential and hype at the time will automatically be a better player (see Heaps, Jake), but that's not what we discussing, now is it?