I mean, you keep moving the target and going on about some strange tangent that doesn't line up with your "evidence" or even the statement you think you're trying to prove.

First you say that you read something in the Utah student newspaper about some rumor. Then you link an article from the Tribune's archives. How are those things connected? Yes, we know that Utah was audited. Sure. But that doesn't sync up to anything else you're saying.

You probably should just get back to honeymooning and walk away at this point.