Nov 6, 2019
12:59:08pm
12:59:08pm
And if these rules were in place, how would that have been unfair to Alabama?
If you slip up or stumble, it’s on you.
But no one else got to keep you out based on their opinion of your quality.
One is inherently more just than the other. And creates a truer champion because it defines champion as the ultimate winner of this great year-long contest. Not the winner of a two-game series that includes who we “think” is the best.
But no one else got to keep you out based on their opinion of your quality.
One is inherently more just than the other. And creates a truer champion because it defines champion as the ultimate winner of this great year-long contest. Not the winner of a two-game series that includes who we “think” is the best.
- Bio page
- mvtoro
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Last login
- May 18, 2024
- Total posts
- 11,674 (759 FO)
Messages
Time
11/6/19 9:02am
Top non-P5 should be included only if the playoff is this large. But giving them a top 5 seed is dumb
11/6/19 9:04am
I understand the argument. I just disagree. It sucks but G5 schedules are just horrible compared to P5
11/6/19 9:57am
11/6/19 10:15am
11/6/19 9:22am
11/6/19 9:20am
11/6/19 3:04pm
11/6/19 11:19am
11/6/19 11:55am
11/6/19 11:57am
If it’s fed by conference championships rather than rankings, then the regular season is just as important to the end.
11/6/19 12:13pm
More important: There should be no arbitrary benefit awarded by anything other than wins and losses.
11/6/19 12:46pm
11/6/19 12:52pm
11/6/19 1:05pm
11/6/19 12:49pm
It's not about only winning because schedules people play are so inherently unequal that it's impossible
11/6/19 1:02pm
11/6/19 1:10pm
11/6/19 1:12pm
11/6/19 9:05pm