Apr 8, 2020
10:57:59am
10:57:59am
I'm not asking for peer review. What I'm saying is the foundation of their
Hypothesis sucks. The science of their binding site analysis is way over my intelligence, so I can only trust that it is accurate and let others with more intelligence debate it.
But, their hypothesis is so bad it seems like it was generated AFTER they did their empiric evaluations. That's not scientific and so it should question the validity of their findings.
Yes, I read the study. I bet I'm probably the only one on here that did read it.
But, their hypothesis is so bad it seems like it was generated AFTER they did their empiric evaluations. That's not scientific and so it should question the validity of their findings.
Yes, I read the study. I bet I'm probably the only one on here that did read it.
- Previous username
- 1viking1
- New username
- Uno Doctoro
- Bio page
- doctorcoug
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
- Last login
- Oct 6, 2023
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
Messages
Time
4/8/20 10:15am
4/8/20 10:20am
4/8/20 10:39am
4/8/20 10:58am
4/8/20 1:18pm
4/8/20 10:55am
4/8/20 1:09pm
4/8/20 12:39pm
4/8/20 1:16pm
4/8/20 1:22pm
4/8/20 10:24am
4/8/20 11:53am
4/8/20 1:56pm
4/8/20 10:37am
4/8/20 10:51am
4/8/20 10:57am
4/8/20 11:09am
4/8/20 1:48pm
4/8/20 11:10am
4/8/20 10:47am
4/8/20 1:13pm