an interview from a former employee. Your claim, after all, was that the DoD itself had admitted these things. It is now abundantly clear that this is not the case.

Once again, when pressed for evidence behind a particular claim, you retreat to "what about everything else." You did the same thing with the gofast video. Individual lines of evidence must stand or fall on their own. This cuts both ways, where one particular line of evidence not holding up does not negate any others. That's why it is particularly puzzling that you cling to the gofast video which is demonstrably not going fast.

By the looks of things, Elizondo is disgruntled because the DoD did not take his conclusions seriously. If they admitted to his conclusions as you claim, he would most likely still be perfectly happy in his job. Why do you think they didn't take his conclusions seriously? 

While we are looking at the total body of evidence in the DoD's behavior, taking Elizondo seriously is not the only thing they are not doing. They are also not making a serious effort to understand and reverse engineer this alleged technology. If they were, there would be a talent vacuum left behind not seen since the Manhattan project. Such vacuums are apparent even if the nature of the work is top secret.

Maybe, just maybe, the higher ups in the DoD are privy to additional information that explain those incidents? Nope, must be aliens.