What explicitly do you even mean by that? That's the problem here, your refusal to actually clearly define and defend a position. It is always vague allusions and wishy washy statements. When holes are shown in one line of evidence, you try to divert attention towards different lines to dismiss those holes. I will gladly step through the other points you list in your post, but not until we can wrap up previous ones. So, simple question: Is the object in the gofast video actually going fast? If not, what about it is compelling evidence for extraterrestrials visiting earth?