Mellon acknowledges that. I'm assuming its Mick West analysis you keep referring to. Sure. What about gimble and FLIR? Those can't be written off quite as easily. Especially gimble. And for me, it all goes back to the Nimitz encounter. You can't just ignore those events.

Listen to John Ratclifffes interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNLCfSnJDgs

Senator Marco Rubio (skip to 1:45)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do36yMWyuQI

Listen to Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Christopher Mellon with Joe Rogan #1645. I think he is a highly credible individual that held an important position. Does he have no credibility to you?

Regarding Elizondo, have you heard why they don't "take him seriously"? UFOs are still taboo. They are dangerous politically. Despite have mountains of rock solid data, General Mattis was insulated from AATIP findings out of fear of political repercussions. It's a toxic issue, largely because of close-minded individuals such as yourself. Additionally, there were individuals in the DoD who didn't escalate these reports and findings for religious reasons also. This new information we have really is paradigm shifting, earth shattering stuff. Institutions are(rightfully) terrified about how the public will react to this information once it is released.

And do you legitimately believe we aren't trying to understand this technology? Of course we are. We've been trying to replicate it for decades. The technology represents such a massive leak forward that it is absolutely a high priority. I believe it's so complex and so advanced that we just haven't figured it out yet. This is based on comments from the above individuals and physicists like Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis.

The real issue here is that it is taboo. It's awkward. Uncomfortable. It will rock the boat in a big way. So guys like you bury your head in the sand. You're the modern day equivalent of the catholic church accusing Galileo of heresy. Time will prove me correct.