I'm not talking about Kansas St or Baylor being included by association initially, but crossing the gap from the have-not to the haves. It's insanely demanding. Utah and TCU are the only two to have done so and their performance for the better half of a decade was off the charts.

UTAH: In the 8 seasons before Utah joined the PAC12,
they won 78.2% of their games,
including 73.9% against AQ conferences
and 80% against non-AQ and
finished in the top 5 twice.

TCU: In their 7 MWC seasons before going to the Big 12, TCU did even better,
winning 85.6% of their games,
including 80% against AQ opponents
and 87% against non-AQ
and finished in the Top 10 four times.

BYU (from MWC era): In their 7* MWC seasons before Indy, BYU
won 69.3% of their games,
including 45% against AQ opponents
and 76.5% against non-AQ
and with 0 top 10 finishes (although 3 in the top 15).

Over the last decade as an independent BYU has
won 60% of their games
including 39.5% against P5
and 71.4% against G5
with one #11 finish

Definitely good, but also not at the same level as Utah and TCU before they moved up. And before we talk about the tougher schedule, it's worth noting that BYU has 17 P5 victories over the last 10 years.... the exact same number of (AQ) wins that Utah had in an only 8 year span before going PAC12. The only difference is that Utah did that in 23 games, losing only 6. BYU has done it in 43 opportunities, losing 26.  BYU still isn't winning against P5 opponents as often as Utah or TCU were, despite having MANY more opportunities.

Bottom Line:  If we want a P5 invite, we simply have to play better.  Instead of moaning and complaining, let's realize what needs to be done and to hold the team accountable to that level.  This last year was a great start, now we need to follow it up.  That's the level we have to play at to force the issue (historically speaking) and that's without even considering cultural issues.