This is how a bad leader can ruin things for decades

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jul 23, 2021
10:39:43am

hdx57 Contributor

This is how a bad leader can ruin things for decades

If the PAC10 had stayed at 10 when TX and OU turned them down a decade ago, or added Uu & CU while ejecting WSU & OSU, and then carefully cultivated relationships with UT and OU over the ensuing decade, this would be a very different discussion right now.

Instead we had the Larry Scott clown show 🤡 the COVID non-season, $90M is wasted rent , officiating fiascos and such.

Report problem with this ad

hdx57

Bio page: hdx57
Joined: Jun 29, 2010
Last login: May 7, 2024
Total posts: 1,580 (7 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Cowherd's take on Texas was that they institutionally belong in the PAC12

jrifkin48

7/23/21 6:52am

Definitely. I do wonder if the state legislature would want to associate with

vagabonder

7/23/21 6:59am

Having a team in the PAC12 and one in the SEC would be their best political move

jrifkin48

7/23/21 7:16am

Didnt they blacklist the state that provides them with much of their electricity

DiamondMo

7/23/21 7:59am

It’s an interesting situation. He’s not wrong about the institution

gww687

7/23/21 7:05am

The PAC can’t pay enough

Nat Gas Man

7/23/21 7:07am

The money is basically the same in the two conferences

krindorr

7/23/21 10:17am

But $60M in the SEC is an open and shut case

Nat Gas Man

7/23/21 10:41am

Agreed, the SEC/BIG10 are in a tier of their own above the other P5 conferences

krindorr

7/23/21 10:57am

No it is not

hdx57

7/23/21 10:51am

I'd wager Texas/Oklahoma is enough to swing that $4M/yr difference

krindorr

7/23/21 10:59am

But Texas and OU want top tier money

hdx57

7/23/21 2:21pm

Oh agree, SEC is much better choice than PAC; never doubted that

krindorr

7/23/21 2:49pm

You keep trying to make the case that P12 remains nationally relevant after this

hdx57

7/23/21 2:33pm

I’m not sure PAC 12 helps in recruiting, though.

SlyCoug

7/23/21 7:07am

Because they're soft and insecure?

-C9-

7/23/21 7:08am

Pointless take. They aren’t looking for a pay cut to a league with a terrible tv

7/23/21 7:10am

But the PAC12 would want them more than the SEC. Gives them leverage for more $

jrifkin48

7/23/21 7:15am

PAC has a new leader that can drop this PAC12TV failure and go to ESPN, NBC=$$$$

DoseOfReality

7/23/21 8:07am

The unequal share is the only thing keeping them Big12 over PAC12

krindorr

7/23/21 10:19am

PAC12 has spent the last decade making themselves increasingly irrelevant.

IrishBlue

7/23/21 7:16am

This is how a bad leader can ruin things for decades

hdx57

7/23/21 10:39am

True, won't matter. Presidents do what they are gonna do.

LEDSFW

7/23/21 8:21am

NO ONE east of Denver wants to be in the PAC. You are in "TV" purgatory.

TrueBlue67

7/23/21 8:34am

Geographically it is a really bad fit. And for TV time slots even worse. But otherwise, I think he is right.

7/23/21 9:09am

Cowherd still thinks the PAC12 is relevant.

7/23/21 9:14am

His point about Austin is true. But the UT footprint stretches far, far wider

shoganai

7/23/21 9:44am

Right now the PAC12 is desperately hoping the SEC votes against Texas/Oklahoma

krindorr

7/23/21 10:16am

I think people are forgetting that the PAC 12 shut it all down last year

IgnoreThem

7/23/21 5:12pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad