For starters, he suggests that Colorado's commitment of 99 years would mean they're in "through 3022," which is closer to a millennium than 99 years. Also, in point 3, he describes the Big 12 as "missing a detail," because Colorado is allowed to "simply warrant it has 'institutional control of athletes,'" while Utah basically warrants that it isn't currently under investigation. If anything, I read that as Utah negotiating clearer agreement terms and avoiding a broader, more ambiguous representation about institutional control. Assuming that Utah would know that it isn't under NCAA investigation, they have an easier representation to make, while Colorado makes its representation about institutional control broadly, without regard to whether there is an investigation.