You seem to be confusing atmospheric temperature with global heat content

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 4, 2014
12:05:16pm

Defenestrator

You seem to be confusing atmospheric temperature with global heat content

That post shows that the earth has indeed been warming in the last 17 years. All evidence points to that. You are confusing atmospheric temperature with heat. The heat content of the earth has kept increasing. Any apparent halt in increasing atmospheric temperatures is mainly the result of ocean cycles like El Nino/La Nina. That is why it is important to look at long term trends, not short term swings. The post outlines all of this.

Climategate was one tiny little chunk of data, and has been egregiously blown out of proportion.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Climategate

You cannot dismiss the massive body of evidence for climate change over this incident.

Report problem with this ad

Defenestrator

Bio page: Defenestrator
Joined: Dec 2, 2008
Last login: Jun 17, 2024
Total posts: 9,155 (2,295 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Past climate change and evidence for current anthropogenic global warming

1/4/14 10:01am

Thank you for sharing, I highly doubt people will troll this post.

CougarHut

1/4/14 10:02am

tub fart

Mayor of Cougartown

1/4/14 11:22pm

We'll never get India or China on board with carbon reduction plans. Even if

SandYFan

1/4/14 10:04am

What to do about it is a conversation I would love to have another day.

1/4/14 10:06am

Like I said, that's all fine and dandy, but it's meaningless. Even if everyone

SandYFan

1/4/14 10:07am

China will change sooner thank you think. India maybe not.

evanshrugged

1/4/14 12:30pm

Ok now show me why I should give a crap

cheezedawg

1/4/14 10:07am

That will be the subject of a follow up topic.

1/4/14 10:11am

Good thing the earth isn't human!

BYUCoug11

1/4/14 10:15am

It was merely an example to show the drastic effects that seemingly slight

1/4/14 10:18am

You seem pretty sure that you've convinced everyone with your extremely long

BYUCoug11

1/4/14 10:24am

You can debate the data but to choose to ignore it is ignorant.

RobDog

2/28/17 10:26am

That's a nonsense question.

cheezedawg

1/4/14 10:16am

In my next installment I will show how your question was equally nonsense;)

1/4/14 10:19am

I look forward to it.

cheezedawg

1/4/14 10:24am

Btw- I assume your next installment will include a cost-benefit analysis of

cheezedawg

1/4/14 10:27am

Unlikely. I'm dealing with the science right now, that is more of a question of

1/4/14 10:32am

Then what is your point? "Proving" the harmful effects of

cheezedawg

1/4/14 10:49am

While I agree that it is important to separate politics from the science,

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:10am

RE: While I agree that it is important to separate politics from the science,

1/4/14 11:17am

Nor do I, but I don't think sub-par technology should be implemented if the cost

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:25am

I agree. Most of our money at this stage should be spent on R&D, not trying to

1/4/14 11:29am

This is the problem. There is no defensible reason for the costs that

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:07am

The evidence is solid. The question is what can we do about it? I would agree

RobDog

2/28/17 10:40am

can't go it alone? We're among the worst offenders

Dissenter

2/11/19 8:20am

The absurdity of this statement shows why you really aren't qualified to

1/4/14 12:57pm

You are reading way too much into that statement. The evidence speaks, not me.

1/4/14 1:06pm

<< Deleted >>

Mall Santa

1/4/14 10:24am

So are you a weekend warrior or do you actually have credentials in this field?

WDaddy

1/4/14 10:25am

*crickets* The lack of response tells me all I need to know

WDaddy

1/4/14 10:44am

as soon as we get warmer, all my land holdings in wisconsin will be worth bank.

TN_Coug

1/4/14 10:25am

Global warming is supposedly causing

1/4/14 11:42pm

I appreciate your efforts.

PJMort

1/4/14 10:30am

This doesn't seem like an original thought and you copy and pasted

SBJ

1/4/14 10:31am

What blog did he copy and paste from?

dchandle15

1/4/14 10:59am

I think he is refering to the caption that I borrowed from skepticalscience.com

1/4/14 11:09am

Are you a climate scientist?

WDaddy

1/4/14 11:12am

Manbearpig really is real? Who knew

Sgt Schultz

1/4/14 10:35am

Pretty sure your "facts" got debunked yesterday:

1/4/14 10:37am

Hardly.

1/4/14 10:40am

So let me get this straight, you are using sources that back up your claim

1/4/14 10:59am

You actually have it quite crooked.

1/4/14 11:15am

OK, so please explain to me WHY we are not seeing the increase

jdub

1/4/14 10:49am

Please hold while he surfs the internet aggregating information

WDaddy

1/4/14 10:57am

This is my primary question as well.

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:04am

RE: This is my primary question as well.

1/4/14 11:35am

So, you don't know how the oceans are warming,

jdub

1/4/14 11:44am

Not at all. You seem to be ignoring all the fingerprints of warming by caused

1/4/14 11:56am

I appreciate the honesty

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:48am

I think the key issue here is separating the earth as a whole from individual

1/4/14 12:00pm

RE: OK, so please explain to me WHY we are not seeing the increase

1/4/14 11:28am

I don't think that answers his (our) question.

Y Mountain

1/4/14 11:32am

You effectively avoided the question

jdub

1/4/14 11:35am

RE: You effectively avoided the question

1/4/14 11:54am

You make the same mistake. Do you really think 60 years is really that long from

1/4/14 1:07pm

60 years is more than enough time to factor out all know natural cycles, which

1/4/14 2:52pm

Except there are 100,000 year cycle and other cycles that don't appear to be

1/6/14 4:18pm

Prove it mathematically ... it should be easy to do

youngbuck

1/4/14 11:26am

there was never anything remotely close to any kind of scientific consensus for

1/4/14 11:40am

Since when is science about consensus?

Michael Skarn

1/4/14 3:54pm

And I was pointing out how the media driven ice age scare of the 60/70's was not

1/4/14 4:07pm

You're actually talking in circles and making false claims

Michael Skarn

1/6/14 2:16pm

The head of the UN IPCC disagrees with you. Temps have not increased for

scvcoug

1/4/14 11:32am

see the topic linked at the beginning of this thread.

1/4/14 11:37am

I saw the thread, but it still doesn

scvcoug

1/4/14 11:52am

Oops--I saw the thread. It doesn't change the fact that

scvcoug

1/4/14 11:56am

You seem to be confusing atmospheric temperature with global heat content

1/4/14 12:05pm

Ah yes the magic heat--heat from the sun passes through the atmosphere

scvcoug

1/4/14 10:10pm

This seems like a good research review, but not necessarily great evidence

dchandle15

1/4/14 11:34am

RE: This seems like a good research review, but not necessarily great evidence

1/4/14 12:05pm

And I understand it takes a long time to do a research review like this one

dchandle15

1/4/14 12:14pm

Yeah, I probably tried to cover too much too quickly.

1/4/14 12:25pm

It's kind of an interesting discussion to have, you might want to make it a

dchandle15

1/4/14 12:32pm

Now I will try to clear up some of the fuzzy areas and fill in some holes.

1/4/14 12:39pm

If the point of your posting was just to give research, it is decent

dchandle15

1/4/14 12:55pm

Understandable. Thanks for your constructive input.

1/4/14 1:07pm

First of all

BigEasyCougar

1/4/14 11:56am

RE: First of all

1/4/14 12:19pm

RE: First of all

BigEasyCougar

1/4/14 1:25pm

RE: First of all

1/4/14 1:39pm

Thanks , I will read them

BigEasyCougar

1/4/14 3:08pm

This is spot on. Even if warming is caused by humans there's a lo t of evidence

1/4/14 1:19pm

Could I see this evidence for negative feedback loops?

1/4/14 1:43pm

Well the quick rebalancing of climate after volcanic eruptions is just one quick

1/4/14 5:56pm

Can I see the evidence for the positive feedback loop. Certainly not the lack

scvcoug

1/4/14 10:12pm

Adaptation is the best answer I've heard to the problem

riseandshout

1/4/14 4:07pm

That is indeed a huge question.

1/4/14 5:01pm

I think we are far more likely to solve any climate problems through

1/4/14 6:01pm

I wonder how many fossil fuels were required to produce the electricity you used

byutx

1/4/14 12:05pm

Can someone please send some of that global warming here for the next few days?

mwcoug

1/4/14 12:49pm

Thanks ... interesting stuff

coolcats

1/4/14 4:47pm

I read somewhere CO2 from caveman campfires ended the ice age

Francisco d'Anconia

1/4/14 5:11pm

I hear a lot of “so what, nothing can be done, it’s too expensive”, etc.

1/4/14 6:42pm

What the global warming crowd wants to do

1/4/14 11:20pm

"No one wants to destroy our environment or pollute the air and water". Yet we

1/5/14 12:10am

It's not about science, it's about liberty or tyranny

Texan

1/4/14 7:13pm

I hate to be the one to give you this breaking news, but 2013 is already over

1/4/14 7:25pm

I think it might still be 2013 in Japan or somewhere.

coolcats

1/4/14 8:31pm

It all proves nothing

1/4/14 11:06pm

This will be his response:

WDaddy

1/4/14 11:51pm

Not sure if this has been asked before.

rtNelson

1/5/14 2:11am

Some of the ramifications are discussed in this post and in the article linked

Japan Coug

1/5/14 4:02am

You aren't gonna like the ramifications...

detmer4prez

1/6/14 8:36am

Is it really possible to get the politics out of this?

DazeofBlue

1/5/14 7:37am

Have you seen the latest IPCC report?

jkccoug

1/5/14 12:52pm

For your next trick could you tell us all how vaccines cause autism?

detmer4prez

1/6/14 8:43am

One issue is backed by science one is not. We don't get to just choose what

RobDog

2/28/17 2:55pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad