It is abundantly clear to me that you have not read any of these topics and are instead latching on to Freddie because he was the only one to put together a reasonable rebuttal. Unfortunately, it falls flat.

"So let me get this straight, you are using sources that back up your claim"

Yep, a plethora of them.

"Freddie used sources that showed that there are flaws in your sources."

Nope. Completely false. He proved a source that shows that shows that there is room for improvement in the model used in ONE of my sources. He then proceeded to egregiously misrepresent that source to claim that all my sources are junk.

"Yet, there isn't a problem because you used different sources?!"

Nope. Even if I used the same source, there would have only been a minor increase in uncertainty. You seem to view this all as a house of cards. It is more like a jigsaw puzzle where you must examine all of the pieces to get the full picture.

"Seriously, that has to be the most backward logic I've ever heard."

This sounds quite trollish. If your next response doesn't indicate a modicum of thought on your part or that you read through the posts, I'm done responding.