You keep giving credence to the idea that there is a link between vaccinations and autism. Because you continue to post it, we actually do not misunderstand your position: we understand completely that you are ignoring reality, and thinking wackos may have a point. They do not have a point on that issue. They are wrong, have been proven wrong repeatedly and by different studies.

Now, if you were to drop the ridiculous tie to autism thing, and just suggest that some families may have issues with allergies, we would agree with you and say that you are making sense. That is real. It happens, and is a concern that should be addressed. If you were to say some vaccinations (like flu shots, for example) are really a lot of guesswork, and they are of questionable reliability because of their shotgun approach, again, I would agree with you. But you haven't done that You keep claiming your blogger, who even you say is biased, who even you say leans heavily on conspiracy theory, and who starts with a belief in a fabricated, discredited study just may have a point somewhere in his ramblings. C'mon, man. That blogger has like 5 serious strikes against him, but you still giving him credence. If you keep digging through that much crap, it's almost certain there really isn't a diamond in there somewhere.