<< Deleted >>

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jul 7, 2019
4:55:05pm

JmThms Walk-on

<< Deleted >>

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Jul 7, 2019 at 4:55:05pm

Message modified by JmThms on Jul 7, 2019 at 4:56:23pm

Report problem with this ad

JmThms

Bio page: JmThms
Joined: Jul 4, 2012
Last login: Dec 19, 2020
Total posts: 13,784 (11 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I am all for equal pay for the women’s World Cup teams.

dadofkhec

7/7/19 4:01pm

I have not read any specific claims...just claiming

Avery

7/7/19 4:28pm

<< Deleted >>

JmThms

7/7/19 4:55pm

According to the WSJ, women’s side has generated more revenue for USSF

BlackBart

7/7/19 4:43pm

Example of disengenuous cherry-picking by them.

JmThms

7/7/19 4:56pm

Which is? They were just pointing to the audited revenue numbers split

BlackBart

7/7/19 5:33pm

An honest and accurate evaluation would look at a typical 8+ year cycle.

JmThms

7/7/19 6:38pm

So WSJ cherry picked because it fits their politics? Ok...

BlackBart

7/7/19 7:41pm

Good gracious. First of all the point has nothing to do with the WSJ or their

JmThms

7/7/19 9:20pm

This article is correct. You can find the counter "argument" coming from just

JmThms

7/7/19 4:54pm

They are suing to get a revenue-share arrangement for both men and women

BlackBart

7/7/19 5:35pm

It's the % applied equally that is the point of contention. Is it fair that

JmThms

7/7/19 6:57pm

The suit is to get the same % applied to their direct

BlackBart

7/7/19 7:36pm

Wait..... the USWNT players ALREADY receive a HIGHER % of their direct revenue

JmThms

7/7/19 9:22pm

FIFA generated revenue is only regarding the WC. This is with respect to all

BlackBart

7/7/19 9:47pm

Specify what direct USSF revenues and we'll consider them.

JmThms

7/7/19 11:37pm

Report problem with this ad

Report problem with this ad