Specify what direct USSF revenues and we'll consider them.

Jul 7, 2019
11:37:36pm

JmThms Walk-on

You'll likely discover the same pattern: The women's market is under developed. There isn't yet as much demand (and likely never will be, although it can and should be increased).

Report problem with this ad

JmThms

Bio page: JmThms
Joined: Jul 4, 2012
Last login: Dec 19, 2020
Total posts: 13,784 (11 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I am all for equal pay for the women’s World Cup teams.

dadofkhec

7/7/19 4:01pm

I have not read any specific claims...just claiming

Avery

7/7/19 4:28pm

<< Deleted >>

JmThms

7/7/19 4:55pm

According to the WSJ, women’s side has generated more revenue for USSF

BlackBart

7/7/19 4:43pm

Example of disengenuous cherry-picking by them.

JmThms

7/7/19 4:56pm

Which is? They were just pointing to the audited revenue numbers split

BlackBart

7/7/19 5:33pm

An honest and accurate evaluation would look at a typical 8+ year cycle.

JmThms

7/7/19 6:38pm

So WSJ cherry picked because it fits their politics? Ok...

BlackBart

7/7/19 7:41pm

Good gracious. First of all the point has nothing to do with the WSJ or their

JmThms

7/7/19 9:20pm

This article is correct. You can find the counter "argument" coming from just

JmThms

7/7/19 4:54pm

They are suing to get a revenue-share arrangement for both men and women

BlackBart

7/7/19 5:35pm

It's the % applied equally that is the point of contention. Is it fair that

JmThms

7/7/19 6:57pm

The suit is to get the same % applied to their direct

BlackBart

7/7/19 7:36pm

Wait..... the USWNT players ALREADY receive a HIGHER % of their direct revenue

JmThms

7/7/19 9:22pm

FIFA generated revenue is only regarding the WC. This is with respect to all

BlackBart

7/7/19 9:47pm

Specify what direct USSF revenues and we'll consider them.

JmThms

7/7/19 11:37pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad