politics. Secondly, "I'm all for going backwards" is completely inadequate with regard to getting an accurate picture of real revenue generation difference between the genders. You seem to miss the point. You are aware that the revenue they are referring to is WC generated revenue, and that if you were to focus solely on a timespan during a WWC it would show no MWC revenue, aren't you? That is why it MUST be a timespan that covers a TYPICAL MWC AND typically al WWC. Not a cherry-picked timespan that only furthers their biased interests.

And what does "revenue sharing on their relevant revenue streams" mean? I have proposed that they negotiate redistribution of revenue. But it would be "on the backs of" the big revenue generators, the men. And certainly what it is NOT is an equal pay law suit.