I think it might have been a catch. I think it is overturned 2/10.

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 15, 2019
4:59:35pm

CosmoK All-American

I think it might have been a catch. I think it is overturned 2/10.

Report problem with this ad

CosmoK

New username: Madam Pattirini
Bio page: CosmoK
Joined: Jun 21, 2003
Last login: Jul 28, 2021
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Just watched the 3rd down Pittman catch out of bounds review

zerigke

9/15/19 4:52pm

Too Zapruder to overturn

Indy Coug

9/15/19 4:55pm

And USC got extremely lucky on the long Pittman TD catch.

AD4

9/15/19 4:59pm

Easily could have been offensive PI.

Jeffacka

9/15/19 5:11pm

Was called for almost the exact thing later in the game.

ochobeeguy

9/15/19 7:24pm

Maybe not offensive PI - but definitely went out of bounds on his own!!!

farsurfer

9/15/19 9:54pm

I think it might have been a catch. I think it is overturned 2/10.

CosmoK

9/15/19 4:59pm

I think you are correct. It may have been a makeup call.

Backcountry

9/15/19 5:04pm

My thoughts exactly

towerman

9/15/19 5:14pm

If you just think then they got it right

9/15/19 5:06pm

It really is that simple. I don't know why this is so hard.

9/15/19 5:21pm

And that’s rules of the game. Every team deals with it...

Refugee

9/15/19 9:56pm

It doesn't matter if you think. You have to know.

9/15/19 5:20pm

That’s why I wish the refs only had 60 seconds per review

KingDave

9/15/19 5:24pm

I bet you are a high level exec at some super successful corporation or

slowhiteguy

9/15/19 5:25pm

There should be a shot clock on video reviews. If you can’t see in 30 seconds, move on

9/15/19 5:47pm

I think 4 out of 5 times

johnnybyu

9/15/19 5:22pm

Thank Chad Bunn

Beggar

9/15/19 5:42pm

Not even close to conclusive evidence that his toe touched. Easy "Call stands".

Ironhide

9/15/19 5:55pm

I think the question was control vs. timing of toe touch.

CosmoK

9/15/19 6:40pm

There is no definitive evidence of a toe touch inbounds

Captain Stubing

9/15/19 10:19pm

Watched it several times. I didn't see anything conclusive.

Dr T-bone

9/15/19 6:59pm

I don't think his touched the ground. It may hav skimmed the top of some grass, but it never touched down.

SpiffCoug

9/15/19 6:59pm

Is skimming the top of the grass enough?

kC Cougar

9/15/19 7:17pm

Probably. But w/ BYU goggles on it's not down if it only touches the top of the grass.

SpiffCoug

9/15/19 7:19pm

His left foot touched and propelled him out, but before he had control.

ochobeeguy

9/15/19 7:25pm

This is what I think. The left foot was floating not down.

kiyoshige

9/15/19 8:27pm

But you can't tell if he was still gathering the ball.

ochobeeguy

9/15/19 7:23pm

I think that gets overturned 0/10 times if the booth is doing their job.

Mojave

9/15/19 7:35pm

The point about extremely lucky is fair. Could have been called a catch and then indisputable goes the other way.

9/15/19 8:09pm

Exactly.

Refugee

9/15/19 10:28pm

Key word. "Think". Different from "for sure". That's why call stood.

Coug Dude

9/15/19 9:00pm

RE: Just watched the 3rd down Pittman catch out of bounds review

cmarrio

9/15/19 9:34pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad