You're avoiding a deeper discussion on the issue at hand, which is private property rights and protections.

Would you be ok with intruding on their private property in those cases I presented you in my previous post?

You're failing to see the double standard, regardless of the type of property owned by a private organization or individual.

Because we agree with the message behind the act, doesn't make the means to spread the message legal or correct. The ends can't justify the means. That's not how this country works.

Because an individual is anti-abortion doesn't give them the right to trespass and demonstrate on Planned Parenthood private property. Even if they feel a deep moral conviction to oppose what that group stands for. There is a different place and time and means to present your opposition.

That's been my point all along--name any church owned property, from the most mundane parking garage or church farm, to the most holy and revered sites--neither are fair game for trespass and demonstration because they are private property.