I see that Comcast is against it, which means I'm inclined to be for it. But then I see that Obama and the ACLU are for it, which leads me to believe I should be against it.

From what I've read, everyone is for most parts of net neutrality, but some people don't like what the government might do if given more authority. Generally, I'm inclined to agree that more government involvement is bad, because once they get a little authority in a matter they seem to want more and more. I see that there are some GOPers that are proposing legislation that specifically limits what the govt might be able to do in the future, but that some think it would either be vetoed or found "illegal" because of some law that was passed in the 1920s or something.

Other than concern over what the government might do at some future point by taking control now, is there any specific concern about how things would change tomorrow?