Let's be clear here. Playoffs aren't about fairness.

Apr 20, 2015
2:33:56pm

Nathanael Greene

They are about money. And money is generated when fan interest is high. The most fair way to determine a champion would be a balanced schedule and the team with the best record wins. Period. Playoffs are never about fairness.

Report problem with this ad

Nathanael Greene

Bio page: Nathanael Greene
Joined: Dec 10, 2010
Last login: May 5, 2024
Total posts: 4,441 (301 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I still haven't heard a good explanation why taking the top 16

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 1:45pm

Excellent point about balanced schedules

Busiturtle

4/20/15 1:50pm

The West has been a ton better for almost 14 years.

SandYFan

4/20/15 1:50pm

Yes. And even if it evens out in 3 years (which it won't), what does that have

garyfan

4/20/15 1:52pm

One argument against it is that you'd basically do away with having a WC and EC

garyfan

4/20/15 1:57pm

There is some truth to it

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:16pm

I say disolve the confs Everyone plays everybody once at home and away then have

monkeycowboy

4/20/15 1:57pm

some basketball writers believe Adam Silver will do exactly this

blucoug18

4/20/15 2:11pm

The playoffs are the best place to develop regional rivalries.

Nathanael Greene

4/20/15 1:57pm

Why do rivalries need to be regional? Lakers-Celtics.

garyfan

4/20/15 1:58pm

Rivalries come from playing each other often, especially if the games matter.

Nathanael Greene

4/20/15 2:05pm

The best teams (from both conferences) would still consistently meet in the

garyfan

4/20/15 2:08pm

That was a rivalry because they met in the playoffs so often

rcbyufan

4/20/15 2:07pm

I think there is something to this. But I also don't think there are enough

garyfan

4/20/15 2:16pm

This is the answer.... there are very few rivalries in basketball

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:21pm

And is changing the playoff format so regional teams play less often

Nathanael Greene

4/20/15 2:27pm

It's not intended to create more rivalries. It's intended to allow more fairness

garyfan

4/20/15 2:30pm

Let's be clear here. Playoffs aren't about fairness.

Nathanael Greene

4/20/15 2:33pm

Are you suggesting the OP's proposal would reduce league revenues?

garyfan

4/20/15 2:41pm

Fix what? The NBA is just fine without regional rivalries. There isn't

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:31pm

What regional rivalries would we lose?

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:18pm

Would be good for Jazz, bad for NBA business

Downtown

4/20/15 1:59pm

Why would it be bad for the NBA?

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:18pm

it seems only difference this year would be OKC in over brooklyn besides seeds

El Joffrey

4/20/15 2:02pm

This and "the best" 8 teams making it to the next round

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:29pm

I think it is just the complications that would ensue. It might eventually

rcbyufan

4/20/15 2:02pm

If I am an owner in the West I would prefer a pick 3 spots higher than

kimdaddy35

4/20/15 2:19pm

I haven't heard a good explanation why there needs to be 16 teams

Indy Coug

4/20/15 2:04pm

$$$ and entertainment

wapiti

4/20/15 2:14pm

Money

Bravescoug

4/20/15 2:14pm

I guess I should restate it: I haven't heard of a legitimate competitive reason

Indy Coug

4/20/15 2:58pm

The 1999 Knicks made the Finals as an 8-seed. The 1995 Rockets won the title as

garyfan

4/20/15 3:03pm

Had KD come back healthy in late March

wapiti

4/20/15 4:05pm

There was a time when "these things are cyclical" made sense

wapiti

4/20/15 2:26pm

RE: I still haven't heard a good explanation why taking the top 16

85fan

4/20/15 9:48pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad