Generally utilities need approval to use the easements from either a PUD

Sep 20, 2017
10:23:56am

jkccoug All-American

or a city council or similar. Incumbents obviously argue that isn't necessary and can often exercise significant influence to keep the fiber cable from being laid.

Report problem with this ad

jkccoug

New username: Socrates Johnson
Bio page: jkccoug
Joined: Jul 19, 2002
Last login: Oct 13, 2021
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

For all you competition will fix everything with no net neutrality guys, if one

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:19am

How are they being blocked?

Indy Coug

9/20/17 10:21am

Generally utilities need approval to use the easements from either a PUD

jkccoug

9/20/17 10:23am

So isn't that what we should focus on instead of "net neutrality"?

cheezedawg

9/20/17 10:58am

Depends on the problem you're trying to solve.

jkccoug

9/20/17 1:42pm

And I think ISPs should absolutely be able to allow or ban whatever they want as

cheezedawg

9/20/17 2:17pm

Disagree. Too many people only have two choices.

jkccoug

9/20/17 2:35pm

Which brings me back to 3 posts up- the underlying problem that we should seek

cheezedawg

9/20/17 3:45pm

We could do that. But that kind of thing is so localized that the

jkccoug

9/20/17 3:50pm

You think it's Comcast working alone that's blocking Google Fiber?

SandYFan

9/20/17 10:22am

They're working with the government to stop them

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:26am

Oh hey so without the government they couldn't do anything.

SandYFan

9/20/17 10:27am

I'm confused. Nowhere in his OP did he say "Comcast working alone" was blocking

benny1982

9/20/17 10:37am

The government getting out of this is what gives more competition.

BertoChavez

9/20/17 11:11am

Federal, state, and local government all play different roles. You have to get

TaiJuan

9/20/17 11:14am

Not really. The government has ALWAYS been involved in the Internet.

benny1982

9/20/17 11:16am

The government is neck deep in this already. Wishing they'd get out is not going

DapperDan

9/20/17 11:18am

Wishing? No. Making it happen? Yes.

BertoChavez

9/20/17 11:18am

Unless you're Donald Trump you're wishing

DapperDan

9/20/17 11:20am

Google actually has already recognized that burying fiber is a losing propositio

rcbyufan

9/20/17 10:24am

In large part because of these issues.

Baron

9/20/17 10:26am

Technology issues or legal issues?

jkccoug

9/20/17 10:28am

Legal, the tech isn't a problem. Fiber is as good as it gets

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:35am

That's what I thought.

jkccoug

9/20/17 10:36am

It is considerably more complex than just easements and "legal issues"

cheezedawg

9/20/17 10:51am

But those issues didn't cause them to stop competing. They are still expanding

Skeptical Optimist

9/20/17 10:28am

They did stop competing and had to do something very different.

Baron

9/20/17 10:30am

only if you live in an apartment building with 10 units or more. Which then

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:33am

They think that if they bury fiber something better than near speed of light

jkccoug

9/20/17 10:26am

Fiber is extremely costly to implement. I think they want to move to towers.

Twin Roots

9/20/17 10:46am

It is costly but you won't get GB speeds over wireless

jkccoug

9/20/17 1:44pm

Google is still competing. They bought Webpass and are expanding in many new

Skeptical Optimist

9/20/17 10:25am

Like it says in that article, they went wireless because they were being

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:31am

It's a strategy shift for sure, and that is no doubt because of roadblocks from

Skeptical Optimist

9/20/17 10:53am

That's a low hanging fruit for Google. The future is not in laying cable. Google has purchased several technologies

Rhino84

9/20/17 11:13am

The internet will always run on wires. Places that don't need or want

DapperDan

9/20/17 11:20am

That's what I said when I got my first cell phone. Yes, POPs and Data centers will certainly be wired. I wouldn't

Rhino84

9/20/17 11:31am

Burying cable is expensive, but continues to be the most reliable.

benny1982

9/20/17 11:28am

Over-regulation is the underlying illness. More regulation masks some symptoms but shores up the status quo even more.

el capitan

9/20/17 10:39am

What current regulations are causing the problem?

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:40am

Tons. Your premise kind of implies it.

el capitan

9/20/17 11:57am

Surely you can name a handful or two

DapperDan

9/20/17 12:02pm

RE: Surely you can name a handful or two

el capitan

9/20/17 1:04pm

Searching for "Google Fiber" and posting the first two links you found was a

DapperDan

9/20/17 1:13pm

Meh, it's all I needed. Proves my point.

el capitan

9/20/17 1:31pm

None of them address your point

DapperDan

9/20/17 1:37pm

Why not let it play out first? If no net neutrality is a disaster then it should

rcbyufan

9/20/17 10:41am

Inertia

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:47am

Collective action/public good problems will predictably keep the outcry from

jkccoug

9/20/17 2:53pm

Aren't you are assuming that government regulation doesn't eventually respond

Pasadena

9/20/17 10:47am

So you think competition can fix the problem? If competition is being impeded

Coach's Dad

9/20/17 10:50am

You wouldn't like the fix because it's a step further down the road from

DapperDan

9/20/17 10:58am

IMO that isn't the only available fix. The local tactics that Comcast is using

Coach's Dad

9/20/17 11:16am

It's the most effective and best fix.

DapperDan

9/20/17 11:21am

I can't wait for SuperArmy™ (brought to you by Pepsi & Walmart) to fight ISIS

Posting on CougarBoard