Impact on women’s athletics?

Report problem with this ad

Jun 21, 2021
5:08:06pm

BlackHawkCoug 3rd String

Impact on women’s athletics?

Virtually no women’s program generates a net operating income. Many men’s programs also rely on revenues generated by football and men’s basketball to survive. Now that the free market will be a partner in college athletics, won’t there be market pressures for colleges to abandoned those programs that draw dollars away from the fund needed to compensate top players for their revenue-generating teams? If not, why not? Ultimately, won’t that result in fewer men’s programs, which will open the door under Title IX to eliminate some women’s programs?

Report problem with this ad

BlackHawkCoug

Bio page: BlackHawkCoug
Joined: Aug 8, 2020
Last login: Dec 18, 2021
Total posts: 680 (2 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

The NCAA is gone

MyTwoCents

6/21/21 4:17pm

If you are an NCAA athlete, you need a new board name!

Hoopster

6/21/21 4:19pm

If the cost of doing business goes up that much, there are a lot of programs which will be unable to continue operations

Indy Coug

6/21/21 4:21pm

Congress will solve that problem.

shoganai

6/21/21 4:24pm

I don't think that's a likely outcome

Indy Coug

6/21/21 4:26pm

I don't see how it's avoidable at this point.

shoganai

6/21/21 4:26pm

I agree with your analysis. This ruling doesn' bring any money into programs, it

Jasbo

6/21/21 6:23pm

power 5 will be all that remains.

claw

6/21/21 4:28pm

But not as currently constructed. Many P5 programs won't be able

BYUHgrad

6/21/21 7:59pm

Vanderbilt, Rutgers, and Purdue won't be laughingstocks if they're the remains!

Waluigi

6/21/21 8:03pm

Cal, Ore. St., Wash. St. from the Pac12

BYUHgrad

6/21/21 8:09pm

I misspoke. I meant that they would be the only programs left due to them being

Waluigi

6/21/21 8:14pm

Most of Congress went to college and probably sees a benefit in preserving

Jay Kay

6/21/21 4:40pm

They don’t have to pay players, they just can’t collude to not pay players

califcougar

6/21/21 4:29pm

Correct, which means if even one school decides to pay players, there's nothing

MyTwoCents

6/21/21 4:30pm

Only the big schools, the smaller schools that can’t afford too, can keep going

califcougar

6/21/21 4:37pm

While true, it makes even smaller that small chance that a small school had to

BYU-Ite

6/21/21 5:32pm

Not even Bama has that kind of money

Nat Gas Man

6/21/21 5:34pm

Don’t fool yourself

BYU Grounds

6/21/21 11:01pm

That pitch worked 0 times in the past unless it was another P5 school that will

califcougar

6/21/21 5:43pm

Perhaps you're right. But I think it's more likely they'll spend less money on

MyTwoCents

6/21/21 4:30pm

Do you want a nicer locker room or an extra $20k a year?

Joe Banks

6/21/21 4:33pm

I think you underestimate the deep pockets at many major programs. They'll have

macdizzle

6/21/21 4:36pm

No they won’t. NFL teams make a lot more money than any one college team and the

califcougar

6/21/21 4:38pm

Let's bookmark this post and let's come back to it in 10 years. I'd be willing

macdizzle

6/21/21 4:43pm

I’m willing to bet that programs who’s entire athletic revenue is at most $230

califcougar

6/21/21 5:22pm

You assume donations from boosters will stay the same. Why? If necessary to

jkccoug

6/21/21 6:38pm

There are only about 20 teams that make a profit. This will change sports foreve

Nat Gas Man

6/21/21 4:42pm

Just like a minimum wage artificially deflated jobs the opposite is true

BYU'01

6/21/21 9:01pm

Perhaps, in the long run.

Everyman

6/21/21 4:43pm

They need to divide the division right now

Nat Gas Man

6/21/21 4:46pm

What would the point be?

MyTwoCents

6/21/21 5:08pm

That’s just it, they wouldn’t.

Everyman

6/21/21 8:55pm

THIS

runningryan

6/21/21 6:46pm

Doesn't address Title IX issue

ABCoug

6/21/21 7:03pm

Not necessarily

runningryan

6/21/21 7:23pm

RE: Not necessarily

runningryan

6/21/21 7:37pm

This could have been done at any point - no Supreme Court decision needed

ABCoug

6/21/21 8:33pm

RE: This could have been done at any point - no Supreme Court decision needed

runningryan

6/21/21 10:05pm

Club sports are subject to Title IX as are intramural sports

ABCoug

6/21/21 8:39pm

This is something that could easily be amended with legislation or worked around.

runningryan

6/21/21 10:11pm

Rolling things back in a woke world?

ABCoug

6/22/21 7:37pm

The question that comes up though now is equity

ABCoug

6/21/21 5:06pm

Impact on women’s athletics?

BlackHawkCoug

6/21/21 5:08pm

This is likely to hurt all non-revenue generating sports. Not just women’s.

Zastava

6/21/21 5:12pm

It will hurt all sports not enough revenue to keep most football teams alive

Nat Gas Man

6/21/21 5:20pm

Right now womens athletics gets matched scholarship for scholarship

ABCoug

6/21/21 5:14pm

Would salary caps also be illegal in pro sports?

6/21/21 5:40pm

No under collective bargaining

Nat Gas Man

6/21/21 5:53pm

The players should also pay a market rate for their benefits

CougarGregor

6/21/21 6:04pm

The Olympics focused for a long time on a model of amateur-only; theye still OK

krindorr

6/21/21 6:23pm

The olympics did change quite a bit.

BlackHawkCoug

6/21/21 8:00pm

It'll change, be different, but it won't cease to be; that was my point

krindorr

6/21/21 8:03pm

I struggle to distinguish this from leagues with salary caps and max contracts

reddead

6/21/21 6:44pm

Unions and collective bargaining agreements- that’s why it is legal in the pros.

BYU-Ite

6/21/21 6:48pm

Not only is this the end of the NCAA, it ends College sports as we know it.

6/21/21 7:28pm

Except... the TAX MAN COMETH contrary to what some of you think. What SCOTUS...

LEDSFW

6/21/21 11:41pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad