that the cheerleader, who got jumped, is a monster for fighting back against his attacker who must have had down syndrome or some other mental issue.

And how do you know that? You offered two reasons 1. He must be mentally challenged because why else would someone assault the cheerleader (your words, not mine, but have you really spent much time around sports fans, particularly college-aged ones?); or 2. You know he's mentally handicapped because you saw him (from some distance, I might add), and you're just sure of it.

And you first started talking about it like it was a well-known fact. Truly amazing.

This whole thing is amazing. I'm surprised that you don't see how problematic your statements, implications, and accusations are.