Sep 18, 2018
11:14:43am
11:14:43am
It was called a catch, it could go either way. It was not conclusive that
he never had position during the 2.5 steps he took on the way down thus it could have easily been called a catch. Refs typically uphold the on the filed call due to lack of video evidence.
Am I surprised that it was called back, not at all. Even if we lost I would not really put too much weight on the call being missed but I think it should have been called a catch because it was called a catch from the beginning.
Am I surprised that it was called back, not at all. Even if we lost I would not really put too much weight on the call being missed but I think it should have been called a catch because it was called a catch from the beginning.
- Previous username
- PoopTown LLC
- Bio page
- Pretorian
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Last login
- May 23, 2024
- Total posts
- 12,939 (19 FO)
Messages
Time
9/18/18 9:38am
9/18/18 9:50am
9/18/18 10:34am
9/18/18 3:34pm
9/18/18 4:51pm
9/18/18 9:39am
9/18/18 9:41am
9/18/18 9:41am
9/18/18 1:03pm
9/18/18 11:27am
9/18/18 7:43pm
9/18/18 10:15am
9/18/18 2:07pm