My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Apr 24, 2019
8:16
:53
am
NorCal Cougar
Playmaker
I know. Just not buying it because that's not the player Pavelski is. He was
definitely cross-checked.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
NorCal Cougar
Bio page
NorCal Cougar
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Last login
Jun 9, 2024
Total posts
2,062 (49 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Two points about Vegas Golden Knights and Sharks in Game 7 last night...
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:03am
Well said.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:05am
Flopped? After Eakin cross-checked him he was shoved down again by Stastney.
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 8:11am
I think he’s referring to the initial response to the cross check where Pavs
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:14am
The first reaction was not a flop either. Nearly every player loses their
southbaycoug
4/24/19 8:16am
I know. Just not buying it because that's not the player Pavelski is. He was
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 8:16am
My friend from Canada was watching and called it a flop that turned sour
(Private)
4/24/19 8:31am
<< Deleted >>
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 9:58am
You sir are not being objective if you genuinely believe Pavelski flopped???
southbaycoug
4/24/19 8:15am
Consider the context of the play. Sharks are down 3-0, time running out on...
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:57am
Nope. Not a flop. Been watching him play for years.
southbaycoug
4/24/19 7:49pm
I’d put the blame for the loss at 30 percent refs 70 percent knights
Josef K
4/24/19 8:16am
I don't disagree with this at all. The Knights blew a 3-1 series lead and a....
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:52am
I thought I had seen every excuse until now, calling Pavelski a flopper?
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:21am
Seriously. What a bad take by the OP.
BerkeleyCoug
4/24/19 8:58am
Eakin's goal made it 2-0.
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:08am
Yep, that was a typo. It was 3-0 when the penalty happened. Regardless, that
BerkeleyCoug
4/24/19 9:11am
I said this last night, but the NHL really needs to put cameras in the glass
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:13am
I said it would come back based on two of the replay angles, but the one from
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:16am
There's no blood on the ice if Pavs didn't get hit in the mouth in game 1.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:15am
I’m no Pavelski fan, but he didn’t flop there
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 9:02am
This person says that by rule, a cross-check that results in injury is a major
Niiineteeen84
4/24/19 8:23am
Wrong. He’s quoting USA hockey rule not the NHL.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:25am
This is not true. Here's the NHL Rulebook definition. Note the distinction...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:17am
Die Hard VGK fan...and you are wrong. He did not flop, (maybe flailed a bit)
Tweege
4/24/19 8:29am
4 min double minor based on blood would have been better call IMO.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:32am
I've never heard of a "double minor." In those cases, does one of the minor
StarMan
4/24/19 8:36am
It looks like Pistol Shrimp answers my question below. Thx
StarMan
4/24/19 8:38am
It’s conceptually 2 2-min minors in a row. If a goal is scored during the first
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:51am
This would have been the right call. At most would have resulted in 2 goals even
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:37am
Yep, 2 goals and momentum. Maybe sharks get the third who knows.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:50am
As I’ve said in other threads, 4-min double minor would be my preferred call
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:54am
They would have to call a high stick in that case, because cross-checking
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:38am
Well they did tell Gallant it was a stick to the head, so maybe they should have
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:42am
Yeah refs believed it was a cross check to the face that caused the injury.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:48am
In real time, unfortunately, the refs didn't see it. Watch the ref's head after
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:53am
That’s the linesman he can’t call penalties.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:58am
Right, but none of the refs called it real time, and it was only after they
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:08am
The guy next to the play doesn't have the ability to call a penalty regardless.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 9:46am
I'm sorry the Flames lost, too, but I don't know that you can really compare the
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:57am
You cant compare the Pavelski penalty with the Saints and Rams no call.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 10:05am
Also, if they see something they believe to be a major, they are required
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 9:13am
I'm not saying that he simply jumped up and landed on his head on purpose; I...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:03am
Not a Knights or Sharks fan, but I don’t think Pavelski flopped.
HomeTownHero
4/24/19 8:32am
Again, I'm not saying he just flopped to the ground on purpose, but I do think..
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:06am
You should just stop trying bro. He didn’t flop.
southbaycoug
4/24/19 7:57pm
I agree it was a weak call... but you don't have to melt down and allow 4 pts!
(Private)
4/24/19 8:35am
Agree on all counts. Unfortunate/incorrect call followed by inspired Sharks'...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:23am
Sirius NHL talk shows this morning (Ch. 91) were very upset about the call.
(Private)
4/24/19 10:15am
He didn't flop, but it also wasn't a dirty play. Just an accident. It happens.
vegasnative
4/24/19 9:40am
As i sharks fan i can admit it was a bad call. But a flop is hilarious and
ColonelMustard
4/24/19 1:37pm
They have replay, just not for penalties. Only goaltender interference, high
mannheimadler
4/24/19 1:40pm
sorry I meant for situations like this haha. i'll edit. Agreed on the penalty
ColonelMustard
4/24/19 1:41pm
No worries. I feel the same way about replay actually. Posted it last night
mannheimadler
4/24/19 1:42pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad