My Account
Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Apr 24, 2019
8:38
:34
am
The Chelsea Dagger
Contributor
They would have to call a high stick in that case, because cross-checking
Doesn’t allow for a double minor.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
The Chelsea Dagger
Previous username
Chelsea Dagger
New username
Ski-U-Mah
Bio page
The Chelsea Dagger
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Last login
Jun 14, 2022
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Two points about Vegas Golden Knights and Sharks in Game 7 last night...
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:03am
Well said.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:05am
Flopped? After Eakin cross-checked him he was shoved down again by Stastney.
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 8:11am
I think he’s referring to the initial response to the cross check where Pavs
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:14am
The first reaction was not a flop either. Nearly every player loses their
southbaycoug
4/24/19 8:16am
I know. Just not buying it because that's not the player Pavelski is. He was
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 8:16am
My friend from Canada was watching and called it a flop that turned sour
(Private)
4/24/19 8:31am
<< Deleted >>
NorCal Cougar
4/24/19 9:58am
You sir are not being objective if you genuinely believe Pavelski flopped???
southbaycoug
4/24/19 8:15am
Consider the context of the play. Sharks are down 3-0, time running out on...
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:57am
Nope. Not a flop. Been watching him play for years.
southbaycoug
4/24/19 7:49pm
I’d put the blame for the loss at 30 percent refs 70 percent knights
Josef K
4/24/19 8:16am
I don't disagree with this at all. The Knights blew a 3-1 series lead and a....
CougaReb
4/24/19 8:52am
I thought I had seen every excuse until now, calling Pavelski a flopper?
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:21am
Seriously. What a bad take by the OP.
BerkeleyCoug
4/24/19 8:58am
Eakin's goal made it 2-0.
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:08am
Yep, that was a typo. It was 3-0 when the penalty happened. Regardless, that
BerkeleyCoug
4/24/19 9:11am
I said this last night, but the NHL really needs to put cameras in the glass
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:13am
I said it would come back based on two of the replay angles, but the one from
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:16am
There's no blood on the ice if Pavs didn't get hit in the mouth in game 1.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:15am
I’m no Pavelski fan, but he didn’t flop there
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 9:02am
This person says that by rule, a cross-check that results in injury is a major
Niiineteeen84
4/24/19 8:23am
Wrong. He’s quoting USA hockey rule not the NHL.
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:25am
This is not true. Here's the NHL Rulebook definition. Note the distinction...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:17am
Die Hard VGK fan...and you are wrong. He did not flop, (maybe flailed a bit)
Tweege
4/24/19 8:29am
4 min double minor based on blood would have been better call IMO.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:32am
I've never heard of a "double minor." In those cases, does one of the minor
StarMan
4/24/19 8:36am
It looks like Pistol Shrimp answers my question below. Thx
StarMan
4/24/19 8:38am
It’s conceptually 2 2-min minors in a row. If a goal is scored during the first
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:51am
This would have been the right call. At most would have resulted in 2 goals even
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:37am
Yep, 2 goals and momentum. Maybe sharks get the third who knows.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:50am
As I’ve said in other threads, 4-min double minor would be my preferred call
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:54am
They would have to call a high stick in that case, because cross-checking
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 8:38am
Well they did tell Gallant it was a stick to the head, so maybe they should have
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:42am
Yeah refs believed it was a cross check to the face that caused the injury.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:48am
In real time, unfortunately, the refs didn't see it. Watch the ref's head after
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 8:53am
That’s the linesman he can’t call penalties.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 8:58am
Right, but none of the refs called it real time, and it was only after they
Pistol Shrimp
4/24/19 9:08am
The guy next to the play doesn't have the ability to call a penalty regardless.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 9:46am
I'm sorry the Flames lost, too, but I don't know that you can really compare the
mannheimadler
4/24/19 9:57am
You cant compare the Pavelski penalty with the Saints and Rams no call.
JohnnyComeLately
4/24/19 10:05am
Also, if they see something they believe to be a major, they are required
The Chelsea Dagger
4/24/19 9:13am
I'm not saying that he simply jumped up and landed on his head on purpose; I...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:03am
Not a Knights or Sharks fan, but I don’t think Pavelski flopped.
HomeTownHero
4/24/19 8:32am
Again, I'm not saying he just flopped to the ground on purpose, but I do think..
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:06am
You should just stop trying bro. He didn’t flop.
southbaycoug
4/24/19 7:57pm
I agree it was a weak call... but you don't have to melt down and allow 4 pts!
(Private)
4/24/19 8:35am
Agree on all counts. Unfortunate/incorrect call followed by inspired Sharks'...
CougaReb
4/24/19 9:23am
Sirius NHL talk shows this morning (Ch. 91) were very upset about the call.
(Private)
4/24/19 10:15am
He didn't flop, but it also wasn't a dirty play. Just an accident. It happens.
vegasnative
4/24/19 9:40am
As i sharks fan i can admit it was a bad call. But a flop is hilarious and
ColonelMustard
4/24/19 1:37pm
They have replay, just not for penalties. Only goaltender interference, high
mannheimadler
4/24/19 1:40pm
sorry I meant for situations like this haha. i'll edit. Agreed on the penalty
ColonelMustard
4/24/19 1:41pm
No worries. I feel the same way about replay actually. Posted it last night
mannheimadler
4/24/19 1:42pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad