Mar 17, 2020
12:29:47am
12:29:47am
again, where do you get your numbers. Just simple math shows that 3.4% is holding consistent across the world
as a whole.
As of right now 119,186 affected and 4,805 = 4.03%
So where are you getting your numbers that make that IMPROPER? What other data that is proven in actual cases to date, and deaths to date to rely upon?
Yeah, a young person is at lower risk. That doesn't mean we should extinguish our elderly population.
As of right now 119,186 affected and 4,805 = 4.03%
So where are you getting your numbers that make that IMPROPER? What other data that is proven in actual cases to date, and deaths to date to rely upon?
Yeah, a young person is at lower risk. That doesn't mean we should extinguish our elderly population.
- Bio page
- ChinaFan
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2003
- Last login
- Jun 12, 2024
- Total posts
- 17,263 (278 FO)
Messages
Time
3/17/20 2:31pm
3/17/20 3:59pm
3/17/20 5:39pm
3/16/20 11:37pm
3/17/20 12:12am
3/16/20 11:53pm
the problem in your calculations is that without strong precautions and some lockdowns/quarantines, this illness
3/16/20 11:59pm
I don't know where you get your numbers, but it's held true in China. And no reason to believe it will change.
3/17/20 12:26am
3/17/20 12:31am
3/17/20 12:10am
3/17/20 12:13am
3/17/20 7:20am
3/17/20 5:49am
3/17/20 6:58am
3/17/20 11:22pm
3/17/20 11:23pm
3/17/20 8:55am
3/17/20 11:30pm