Apr 13, 2016
10:57:27am
jayriggity Playmaker
Correct. But gmj81's statement is also correct: we don't know why the HC gets
involved. It might be that they're focused on the attacker. Certainly everyone can agree that sexual assault is an HC violation, which means that every allegation of sexual assault is, by definition, an allegation of an HC violation.

The question isn't whether an HC violation is alleged to have occurred. The question is whether the HCO's involvement is necessary and/or beneficial. The overwhelming opinion from victims and victim advocates appears to be that it is not beneficial and is, instead, detrimental -- the potential outcomes of an HCO investigation dissuade victims from reporting. That should be reason enough to exclude the HCO from the process.
jayriggity
New username
Jay Rick
Bio page
jayriggity
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Last login
Apr 25, 2016
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Messages
Author
Time
4/13/16 6:57am
4/13/16 9:03am
4/13/16 6:26am

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.