Known issue that puts them at increased risk from a vaccination than the population.
Its interesting to me that the people who are pro vax and feel they need to shane or in some way pu5 down someone who chooses to not vax,without knowing the reasons, citing the low risks of vacccinatioms....are often the same people who don't want medical mj or recreational mj....but deny the similarly low risks of adverse reactions to mj.
Its incongruent reasoning .
Personally o think most people should vax unless they know they have an issue with vaccinations and i think people should be allowed to use mjand cbd recreationally and medically as long as they likewise aren't at a higher risk of adverse reactions. Thus people under 25 and with diagnosed schizophrenia (or other psychosis) or certain genes that lend themselves to adverse reactions shouldn't use mj. People allergic to peanuts shouldn't eat peanuts. On and on.
Why is this complicated?