Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up
May 26, 2020
12:00:42pm
displacedute All-American
I think the difference is scope.
The NCAA isn't intended to protect the public, except peripherally. They're intended to make things "fair". State Bars are intended to protect the public. So if a lawyer or a doctor commits a crime that makes their suitability questionable, they're punished by the bar. It's why fraud crimes are so heavily punished by lawyer bars and why DUI are so heavily punished by both organizations (in theory). That's not the purpose of the NCAA, so I don't think they should be involved.

Should the NCAA get involved if coaches cheat on their taxes? What if they are involved in a pyramid scheme? What if they commit insider trading? What if they are involved in an email fraud scheme? I don't think the NCAA should be dealing with any of those things. The reason they got involved at Penn State is because the story was so horrific. I understand that impulse. They have power and they want to use it to help. But I don't think this is their realm and I think they should have left this one alone.
displacedute
Bio page
displacedute
Joined
May 30, 2005
Last login
Apr 25, 2024
Total posts
10,948 (29 FO)
Messages
Author
Time
BYUALWAYSNUM1 All-American
5/26/20 9:54am
5/26/20 10:49am
5/26/20 10:17am
7
5/26/20 11:29am

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.