..."Um...yeah. We might be interested. I mean, maybe. We might be interested if none of our friends from our conference are available. We just want you to commit to us and promise you'll come, but we're going to keep looking checking in with our friends to see if any of them are available. Come Thursday, we'll be able to tell you for sure."

Nah - UW didn't respond in any meaningful way. You keep saying that BYU was asking for a fight and now that UW is offering, BYU is backing off. Not true. UW won't commit to the fight, why should BYU?

You keep asking why UW should be the one to take the risks - WHAT RISKS ARE THEY TAKING?!? All we're asking UW to do is guarantee that they'll play us when we show up. Boy - that sure is a lot to ask of a team. Just out of curiosity - I'm assuming Utah has a bunch of games scheduled over the next few years. How many of those games include the contingency that the team you're facing can cancel the Thursday before if they decide they don't want to play afterall? None? But you expect BYU to accept those terms?

Sure - Wilson said any team, any where, any time. But he's not in charge of putting together the contract - and no one said anything about any terms or any conditions. No one else would agree to that - not even Utah who is hurting for games. Why would BYU?