May 16, 2023
9:28:52am
9:28:52am
Last decade... Going back further would have advantages and disadvantages
Viewership is obviously a different ballgame these days with very different numbers. Also, going back further than that may not be super relevant and create more problems than it solves. Even going back that far is one reason that Stanford rates surprisingly well.
Another factor is my general laziness and lack of availability for TV numbers and other similar things as you go further back
Another factor is my general laziness and lack of availability for TV numbers and other similar things as you go further back
- Bio page
- krindorr
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2020
- Last login
- Jun 2, 2024
- Total posts
- 18,088 (112 FO)
Messages
Time
5/16/23 8:16am
5/16/23 1:09pm
5/16/23 1:55pm
5/16/23 8:28am
5/16/23 8:36am
5/16/23 9:45am
5/16/23 8:42am
5/16/23 8:58am
5/16/23 11:58am
5/16/23 12:39pm
5/16/23 12:53pm
5/16/23 1:15pm
5/16/23 9:44am
5/16/23 1:43pm
5/16/23 1:54pm
5/16/23 4:11pm
5/16/23 9:13am
100% it's a simple back-of-the envelope calculation, useful as a starting point. But I don't see importance of # alumni
5/16/23 9:26am
IMO, TV ratings shouldn't be so much about a set number but more about how teams perform against the
5/16/23 10:28am
5/16/23 10:43am
5/16/23 11:59am
5/16/23 12:55pm
5/16/23 1:40pm
5/16/23 1:41pm
5/16/23 2:04pm
5/16/23 4:06pm
5/16/23 6:21pm
5/16/23 6:57pm
Ok, let's take it by year and see if we can't figure this out: PAC 12 Network games by year for the last decade
5/17/23 8:27am
5/17/23 11:22am
5/18/23 11:28pm
5/19/23 9:58am
5/17/23 9:37am