Mar 9, 2016
6:29:35pm
6:29:35pm
Totally 100% agree
If it's misleading it's because you didn't read that I specifically left those out because I was not measuring team value, just offensive production.
I agree completely that KC was EXTREMELY valuable for all the intangibles.
The only statement I was surprised at myself that came out of this data is that for someone who is unbelievably poor at offensive efficiency, why was he the #1 consumer of offensive opportunities? Why not let him be great at what he was great at.
I agree completely that KC was EXTREMELY valuable for all the intangibles.
The only statement I was surprised at myself that came out of this data is that for someone who is unbelievably poor at offensive efficiency, why was he the #1 consumer of offensive opportunities? Why not let him be great at what he was great at.
- Bio page
- proudcugr
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2013
- Last login
- May 14, 2024
- Total posts
- 755 (0 FO)
Messages
Time
3/9/16 5:21pm
3/9/16 5:37pm
3/9/16 9:20pm
3/9/16 6:08pm
3/9/16 6:12pm
3/9/16 6:29pm
3/9/16 8:30pm
3/10/16 10:27am
3/10/16 2:59pm
3/9/16 8:22pm
3/9/16 8:24pm
3/10/16 5:07pm
3/9/16 11:12pm
3/9/16 11:41pm
3/10/16 6:41pm
3/11/16 12:05pm
3/9/16 11:41pm
3/10/16 1:33am
3/10/16 9:22am
3/10/16 7:42pm
3/10/16 10:52pm